On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:55:13PM +0200, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024, at 22:51, Taylor Blau wrote: > > […] > > > > I think that it is worth saying that this concept is explained well > > throughout other parts of the documentation, including other parts of > > 'git-update-ref(1)', as well as the glossary content. > > > > I don't think that you necessarily need to mention that here. But at > > least I was initially confused thinking that this patch proposed > > removing the only mention of the special "ref:" syntax for symbolic > > references. > > > > But it does not, so I think that this patch as you wrote it is good. > > Let's keep reading... > > You/a reader in general being in doubt is enough reason to mention some > other documentation source. I’ll fix in the next version. > > And thanks for reading! Thank you, and no problem ;-). Thanks, Taylor
