On Tue Oct 15, 2024 at 21:03, <kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > (See the previous email for the context) > > This series removes or moves some old material in the update-ref doc and > improves the discussion of symrefs, opting for a high-level description > with some redundancy (see patch 5/6) in order to avoid a reported > mistake/confusion. > > The end goal (after all patches are applied): > > • First paragraph (in Description) describes the first form > • Second paragraph the second form > • Third paragraph mentions symrefs and explains why `--stdin` supports > them > • A new section whither the symlink (FS) vs. symrefs (`ref: ` files… or > strings nowadays with the different formats that refs can have?) > discussion is moved > • Link update-ref to symbolic-ref and vice versa Thanks, it seems much more clear to me this way! Reviewed-by: Bence Ferdinandy <bence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
