On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 3:49 AM Usman Akinyemi <usmanakinyemi202@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 12:42 AM Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 03:46:05AM +0000, Usman Akinyemi wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 3:56 PM Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Usman, > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 11:21:13AM +0000, Usman Akinyemi wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I was looking at some #leftoverbits which I can work on and I came > > > > > across this conversation. > > > > > https://public-inbox.org/git/CAC4O8c-nuOTS=a0sVp1603KaM2bZjs+yNZzdAaa5CGTNGFE7hQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > > > > I followed the conversation and came accross > > > > > three instances where I think atoi can be > > > > > converted to strtol or strtol_i or parse_timestamp(). > > > > > These are the three files which I think the atoi can be > > > > > replaced with. > > > > > > > > This seems like a good #leftoverbits to use as an Outreachy > > > > contribution. From a brief skim, it looks like this is going in the > > > > right direction. > > > > > > > > But to get help from the rest of the list, please submit this change as > > > > a patch or patch series, following the instructions in: > > > > > > > > - Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt, and > > > > - Documentation/SubmittingPatches > > > > > > > Thanks Taylor, I already went through these as I already sent my first > > > patch before. Also, I already sent a patch as you suggested. Thank > > > you very much. > > > Usman Akinyemi. > > > > I must be missing something... I don't see any patches from you that > > touch e.g., merge-ll.c, which is the first file you mention in this > > thread. > > > > Try searching the list archive for: > > > > f:'Usman Akinyemi' dfn:merge-ll.c > > > > Is this different from the other patches you have sent to the list? My > > apologies if I am missing something here. > > > > Thanks, > > Taylor > Hi, Taylor > > Thanks for the reply. There is a little confusion going on. > > This is what happened. I had two patches which are entirely different > from this leftoverbit. Both has been reviewed by other maintainer and > integrated into seen by Junio through > https://github.com/git/git/commit/4dae47e02757333b7d6a6508e36ccb5463b6ad92 > and https://github.com/git/git/commit/dfdc6a71e76c7a1dab22fc9d9e437c858cfea6dc. > I submitted this leftoverbit patch but I made the mistake of basing it > on top of the previous branch which I use for the two above commits. > This is the commit which has the leftoverbit and the previous two > commits which have already been integrated into seen. > https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.1810.git.git.1728774574.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t > That is the reason why you saw it again. Also, I noticed you also > integrated the two patches again into seen and gave some comments. I > think that might not be needed again. Thank you. I meant for those particular two patches, since it is integrated into seen already, I can probably wait for it to be merged then work on the review which you gave or what do you think should be done ? Thank you.
