Hi, On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > * sp/refspec-match (Sun Nov 11 15:01:48 2007 +0100) 4 commits > > > - refactor fetch's ref matching to use refname_match() > > > - push: use same rules as git-rev-parse to resolve refspecs > > > - add refname_match() > > > - push: support pushing HEAD to real branch name > > > > > > This changes the semantics slightly but I think it is a move in > > > the right direction. > > > > We could add a "--matching" option and output a warning when it is not > > passed. I would like this pretty soon, and would not be sad if it went > > into 'next' before this topic. > > Is this the road towards > 1) "git push --matching" push matching branches. > 2) "git push --current" push only current branch. > 3) "git push" report error if the config does not contain a Push line. > (after it reported a warning for a while). AFAIAC yes. Maybe in two years (that's twice an eternity in git time scales): 4) make "git push --current" the default. > I'd like to see this too. Unfortunately it's unlikely that I'll start > working on it before next weekend. > > "--matching" would be a no-op at this time. Only a warning would be printed > if it is missing. Right? Right. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
