Re: Should object repacking only update server-info for packs instead of doing it for refs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Luca Milanesio wrote:
> > It seems counterintuitive that an operation designed to repack
> > objects would be performing maintenance of any sort on refs?
>
> True, it should not touch info/refs IMHO, as you’re really not
> changing any refs.

Right. I don't think that the current behavior is a bug, but just that
it's doing unnecessary work from within 'git repack' to update the
info/refs file when it's known ahead of time that the refs haven't
changed.

I think it's reasonable to skip this step when repacking, but of course
we would still want to update info/packs (assuming that the repack
wasn't a noop, of course).

Thanks,
Taylor




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux