"Bence Ferdinandy" <bence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri Oct 11, 2024 at 22:56, Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> `ref: refs/remotes/origin/test`? (space after colon) > > I tried a couple of variations and no: > > ❯ git update-ref --no-deref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 'ref: refs/remotes/origin/test' > fatal: ref: refs/remotes/origin/test: not a valid SHA1 > ❯ git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 'ref: refs/remotes/origin/test' > fatal: ref: refs/remotes/origin/test: not a valid SHA1 > ❯ git update-ref --no-deref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 'ref:refs/remotes/origin/test' > fatal: ref:refs/remotes/origin/test: not a valid SHA1 > ❯ git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 'ref:refs/remotes/origin/test' > fatal: ref:refs/remotes/origin/test: not a valid SHA1 > > I guess the intended way of doing this is via git symbolic-ref anyway, but I'm > curious if this should work somehow or I'm misinterpreting the meaning of that > sentence. I do not think update-ref is a tool to modify a symbolic-ref. Moreover, the mention of "ref:" is meant to be for those who are overly curious for their own good and go peek into their .git/ directory; script writers should not have to know such an implementation detail. : ask what the current state is. $ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD fatal: ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD is not a symbolic ref : set it $ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD refs/remotes/origin/main : inspect the result $ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD refs/remotes/origin/master Thanks.