Hi, On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Junio C Hamano schrieb: > > > I am not saying that it is wrong to use submodule to track such groups > > of source trees whose versions are very closely tied together. At > > least not yet. > > In KDE, the supermodule will actually just be a container that binds the > submodules together. The essential development will happen in the > submodules, and the supermodule will receive a commit quite frequently. > In this case, there will often be only a few or a few dozen commits > listed, and I anticipate that the integrator who is going to make the > commit (to the supermodule) will probably like the summary. So I'm all > for it. I like it, too. And we can make the number of shown commits configurable, just like for the merge summary. But I'd rather see the code in wt-status.c than in git-submodule.sh. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html