On 2024-10-08 at 19:34:46, Spencer Fretwell wrote: > Thanks Brian, > > It appears sublime auto-normalizes endings to "whatever occurs most > frequently in the first 32kB". So, I guess it was witnessing the CRLF > from the verbose output and replacing all lines with CRLF. Thanks for > the reminder about --renormalize. > > Is there any chance for git to support a CRLF magic ignore line, > particularly considering the variation in standard line ending across > different platforms? I tried autocrlf=input as well and it sadly > doesn't normalize the commit message file itself. Either way (magic > ignore with CRLF or normalizing line endings in the commit message), > would be appreciated for mixed line ending workflows (especially > considering WSL) The answer is essentially that I don't know. We typically make decisions on whether we'll accept features when we see the patch. My guess is that, assuming someone (maybe you) sends a patch, it will probably be accepted, since I wouldn't expect it would be very difficult to do or have major impacts on the code. It might, as with any patch, take a couple of rounds, though. I use Linux or rarely other Unix systems and always use LF endings, so I don't plan to send a patch since this doesn't affect me, but assuming the patch looked reasonable, I don't see myself having an objection to it. -- brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him) Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
