Re: [PATCH 3/3] t1402: exercise disallowed branch names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 10:15:19PM +0200, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Can we give some more details here? These are cases that already passed
before your series, right? At least I'd expect the "HEAD" one to do so,
but I guess the "@" fix is new?

I don't need a lengthy explanation, just trying to understand how this
change fits into your series. It might be simpler if this came first,
adding new tests for existing behavior that was not covered, and then
your 2/3 patch just adds the "@" line in the same spot.

-Peff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux