On Sunday, October 6th, 2024 at 18:24, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Reviewers are a limited resource on this project[1], so it's ideal if > submissions can be as reviewer-friendly as possible. Extraneous > patches, unnecessary or unrelated changes to surrounding code, etc. > all make a patch series more onerous to review, thus are best avoided. > (This concern prompted all the review comments I left on this patch.) > So, let's drop this patch since it adds no value to either this series > or to the existing codebase. If someone needs such a change later on, > they can resurrect the change. Sounds good, dropped. > [1] There are far more people submitting patches to the project than > reviewing them. For instance, according to Junio's latest "What's > Cooking" report[2], the patch I submitted[3] a couple weeks ago to fix > "git worktree repair" to handle manual copy operations is still > awaiting review. (Since you've now been living in the worktree code a > bit and have had to digest the "repair" logic, perhaps you'd be > interested in reviewing that patch?) I'd be happy to take a look!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
