Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] worktree: link worktrees with relative paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, October 6th, 2024 at 06:05, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When you reroll, please extend the commit message to give a more
> detailed overview of how this patch actually changes the behavior both
> at a high level and at a low level. This is especially important since
> this patch is sufficiently long and involved that it's not easy to
> glean these details at-a-glance from the code changes themselves.

I will do that, I was not sure how much low level detail I should dive into.

> Regarding what you wrote above, there seems to be a good deal of
> redundancy between the first two paragraphs; combining the paragraphs
> and folding out the duplication might make the message more
> streamlined. I do like the discussion about containerized environments
> being used as (at least one) justification for employing relative
> paths, and think that may be a good lead-in for the commit message.
> Please see [1] for some helpful hints for composing a good commit
> message.

Thanks, I will clean up the redundancy and add more detail to the commit.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux