Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> But unfortunately this still caused permission errors when the new path >> was held open by another process. > > Yes, this will _always_ be a problem, I think. The > `FILE_RENAME_POSIX_SEMANTICS` as per its documentation should help, but if > it does not in your tests it might actually not quite work as advertised > (wouldn't be the first time I encounter such an issue). > > I tried to read through the code (it's a lot!) to figure out whether there > is potentially any situation when the `tables.list` file is opened but not > closed immediately, but couldn't find any. Do you know off-hand of any > such scenario? > >> I think for now I'd still lean into the direction of adding the !WINDOWS >> prerequisite to the test and increasing timeouts such that I can >> continue to investigate without time pressure. > > Let me bang my head against this problem for a little while longer. You > might be right, though, that this is a thing we cannot fix in time for > v2.47.0, which would be sad. If you folks think it would help stabilizing the tentative fix, I am open to the idea of delaying the 2.47 by a few days. Currently the 2.47-final is scheduled on the 7th (Monday), but we can do 2.47-rc2 on that day instead, and move the final to 10th (Thu) or 11th (Fri) [*]. Thanks, all, for working together. [Footnote] * All dates are US/Pacific, 10:00 am
