On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:16:09PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > This should be a non-issue. We really should start deprecating > > "git-<command>" in favour of "git <command>" for real. > > > > New users should not even be told that this is correct usage. > > > > If you can write "git-commit" and "git commit" interchangeably > while you cannot say "git-cat-file" and are forced to say "git > cat-file", I suspect that would lead to a great confusion and > unhappy users. One of the reasons why I use git-diff and git-commit and in particular "git-rebase --interactive master" very often is that it allows my shell's bang completion to work. (i.e., "!git-rebase"). If we tell people they can not use "git-rebase", and must instead use "git rebase" instead, I would consider that pretty annoying/obnoxious. - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
