On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 06:27:33AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > If this is causing problems for folks I'd say we can do the below change > for now. It's of course only a stop-gap solution until I find the time > to debug this, which should be later this week or early next week. > > Patrick > > diff --git a/t/t0610-reftable-basics.sh b/t/t0610-reftable-basics.sh > index 2d951c8ceb..ad7bb39b79 100755 > --- a/t/t0610-reftable-basics.sh > +++ b/t/t0610-reftable-basics.sh > @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ test_expect_success 'ref transaction: retry acquiring tables.list lock' ' > ) > ' > > -test_expect_success 'ref transaction: many concurrent writers' ' > +test_expect_success !WINDOWS 'ref transaction: many concurrent writers' ' > test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && > git init repo && > ( IMHO we can live with a flaky test for a little while. It's not like it's the only one. ;) And hopefully your digging turns up a real solution. It also sounds from subsequent discussion that Josh's issue was on Linux, so it wouldn't help there. -Peff
