Re: [PATCH] unit-tests: use xstrfmt() instead of a char buffer in t-reftable-stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> A char buffer is used to hold refname values as formatted strings
> in the reftable_stack_add() test in t/unit-tests/t-reftable-stack.c.
> This can be replaced with a single call to xstrfmt() making the test
> conciser.

It may make the test more concise, but would we now need to worry
about leaking .refname?

It turns out that we do not have to, as we were already storing the
result of xstrdup() to .refname, so we must have been freeing them
already (or we are not making existing leak worse, if .refname were
leaking).

I've heard some noises about using our helper functions in tests, in
that a buggy helper function of ours would interfere with testing
the thing(s) we truly want to test, but we have been using xstrdup()
and replacing it with xstrfmt(), so it is not like we are making
things worse in that regard.  Not that I entirely buy the "don't use
git to test git" argument.

One thing that this worsens is that we now have two copies of the
literal "branch%02"PRIuMAX string.  If we ever want to change one of
them, we must remember to change the other to match.

Perhaps with another constant, this patch would become perfect, like
this?

> Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/unit-tests/t-reftable-stack.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-stack.c b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-stack.c
> index 31d563d992..2d7cfbf8aa 100644
> --- a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-stack.c
> +++ b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-stack.c
> @@ -523,14 +523,12 @@ static void t_reftable_stack_add(void)
>  	check(!err);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
> -		char buf[256];

+		static const char fmt[] = "branch%02"PRIuMAX;

> -		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "branch%02"PRIuMAX, (uintmax_t)i);
> -		refs[i].refname = xstrdup(buf);
> +		refs[i].refname = xstrfmt("branch%02"PRIuMAX, (uintmax_t)i);

+		refs[i].refname = xstrfmt(fmt, (uintmax_t)i);

>  		refs[i].update_index = i + 1;
>  		refs[i].value_type = REFTABLE_REF_VAL1;
>  		t_reftable_set_hash(refs[i].value.val1, i, GIT_SHA1_FORMAT_ID);
>  
> -		logs[i].refname = xstrdup(buf);
> +		logs[i].refname = xstrfmt("branch%02"PRIuMAX, (uintmax_t)i);

+		logs[i].refname = xstrfmt(fmt, (uintmax_t)i);

>  		logs[i].update_index = N + i + 1;
>  		logs[i].value_type = REFTABLE_LOG_UPDATE;
>  		logs[i].value.update.email = xstrdup("identity@invalid");




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux