Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I hoped that change would be in edit_hunk_manually() but it isn't. > > I'm afraid I still don't think that changing the default is a good > idea as it is often very difficult to correct a badly edited hunk. Can > we offer the user a choice of > > (e) edit the original hunk again > (f) fix the edited hunk > (d) discard the edit > > In [1] you say you discarded that idea because the wording was too > verbose but something along like the above should be succinct enough. I too disagree with the change of the default, but I would not complain if we offered the feature to re-edit as long as it is clearly marked as a new optional choice. Phillip, thanks for being firm yet still constructive.