Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mention the amlog in howto/maintain-git.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, at 22:45, Taylor Blau wrote:
> Part of the maintainer's job is to keep up-to-date and publish the
> 'amlog' which stores a mapping between a patch's 'Message-Id' e-mail
> header and the commit generated by applying said patch.
>
> But our Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt does not mention the amlog,
> or the scripts which exist to help the maintainer keep the amlog
> up-to-date.
>
> (This bit me during the first integration round I did as interim
> maintainer[1] involved a lot of manual clean-up. More recently it has
> come up as part of a research effort to better understand a patch's
> lifecycle on the list[2].)
>
> Address this gap by briefly documenting the existence and purpose of the
> 'post-applypatch' hook in maintaining the amlog entries.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/Y19dnb2M+yObnftj@nand.local/
> [2]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAJoAoZ=4ARuH3aHGe5yC_Xcnou_c396q_ZienYPY7YnEzZcyEg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt
> b/Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt
> index da31332f11..fd1560327c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt
> @@ -165,6 +165,22 @@ by doing the following:
>     In practice, almost no patch directly goes to 'master' or
>     'maint'.
>
> +   The maintainer is expected to update refs/notes/amlog with a
> +   mapping between the applied commit and the 'Message-Id'
> +   corresponding to the e-mail which carried the patch.
> +
> +   This mapping is created with the aid of the "post-applypatch" hook
> +   found in the 'todo' branch. That hook should be installed before
> +   applying patches. It is also helpful to carry forward any relevant
> +   amlog entries when rebasing, so the following config may be useful:
> +
> +      [notes]
> +	rewriteref = refs/notes/amlog

Nit: `[notes]` is indented with spaces while the next line is indented
with a tab.  I guess it’s supposed to just be spaces in this context?

> +
> +   Finally, take care that the amlog entries are pushed out during
> +   integration cycles since external tools and contributors (in
> +   addition to internal scripts) may rely on them.
> +
>   - Review the last issue of "What's cooking" message, review the
>     topics ready for merging (topic->master and topic->maint).  Use
>     "Meta/cook -w" script (where Meta/ contains a checkout of the
>
> base-commit: 3857aae53f3633b7de63ad640737c657387ae0c6
> --
> 2.46.2.633.gf09c3c1769.dirty

It might be worth explicitly mentioning the git-cherry-pick(1) footgun
that Junio talked about in his email: you have to restrict yourself to
git-rebase(1) and `git commit --amend`.  Since git-cherry-pick(1)
doesn’t care about (respect?) this configuration.

Right now it’s implied of course (“when rebasing”).

-- 
Kristoffer Haugsbakk






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux