Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] doc: introducing synopsis para

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:16:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Jean-Noël Avila via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Changes since V4:
> >
> >  * used BRE in sed filter
> >  * rework the processing of three dots
>
> The topic has been deep in 'next' already, and I wasn't expecting a
> wholesale replacement.  But thanks for updating.
>
> As the patches are more in the technology demonstration phase by
> converting only a few pages and making sure other uses of `` outside
> the synopsis section in unconverted pages are not broken, we can
> declare that the three-patch series will not be in 2.47 and will
> keep it in 'next'.  So let me revert the merge of the previous one
> out of 'next' and queue this one afresh to 'seen' to see how well it
> works.
>
> Josh (or whoever is taking over this week from him at Google), can
> you see if the breakage you saw that stopped us merging the topic
> before it causes us trouble on 'master' reproduces with this version
> (either by running "make doc" on the topic branch by itself, or on
> 'seen' that merges the topic) in your environment that had trouble
> with the previous round?
>
> It would also be highly appreciated if other macOS users try "make
> doc" and see the resulting git-init and git-clone documentation
> pages are reasonable, both for the previous round that has been
> cooking in 'next' and for this latest round.  Inputs from folks on
> more mainstream platforms with modern asciidoc/asciidoctor toolchain
> would also help.  The more people we have who look at how the new
> way the synopsis section is written and how the resulting documents
> get rendered, the more fairly we can assess the value of this topic.
>
> Thanks.
>

Here a report from a MacOs user,
asciidoc --version
asciidoc 10.2.0

installed via macports.

No problems seen in the seen branch.

I diffed git-init.html from seen of today against both master and next,
some (minor) improvements (like GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY vs $GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY)
All in all it looks all sensible.
(and yes, `sed` understands -E)






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux