Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... I can see an argument for either direction: having a new hash > algorithm provides a smaller change to get most of the results for the > full repack case, but gets worse performance in many push scenarios. > This is the point of an RFC, to get questions like this worked out based > on the "big picture" view of everything. Exactly. We might want to use the series as an example in our developer docs on how to propose a large-ish effort. > Perhaps I should pause the --full-name-hash topic and focus on getting > the --path-walk topic up and running. I am curious to hear from folks > who are currently running Git servers about their thoughts on these > trade-offs and potential uses in their environment. My needs on the > client side are solved by the --path-walk approach. Yeah, such third-party inputs would be very useful. Thanks.
