韩仰 <hanyang.tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > In $JOB, we modified git-repack to pack everything into a giant promisor > pack if the repo is partially cloned. I would imagine that would give you pretty much similar results as the posted patch without incurring the cost of transfering the same objects from the promisor remote. > This basically does the same thing as > you suggested, but without the cost of constructing the object list and > removing the objects in the promisor packs. Yup, repacking, instead of creating a new pack only to hold the objects in the gap, would be much simpler.
