Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes, either forward or backward. Having to keep a series that looks > potentially worth doing for weeks on 'seen' without getting any > movement is *VERY* painful. Would it motivate more experienced > contributors to review and express either support or refusal if I > more frequently, say after 20 days since its latest round got queued > on 'seen', a topic that does not seem to get enough support to be > merged to 'next' and is not getting rerolled? Missing verb was "discard". Instead of keeping the stalled topic, perhaps I should more actively discard them (people are allowed to send in a fresh iteration if they care enough)? Sorry for the noise.
