shejialuo <shejialuo@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Because we consider deprecating writing the symbolic links and for
> reading, we may or may not deprecate. We first need to asses whether
> symbolic links may still be used. So, add a new fsck message
> "symlinkRef(INFO)" to let the user be aware of this information.
If that is the intention, the the documentation entry is somewhat
out of line.
> +`symlinkRef`::
> + (INFO) A symref uses the symbolic link. This kind of symref may
> + be considered ERROR in the future when totally dropping the
> + symlink support.
A symbolic link is used as a symref. Report to the
git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list if you see this error, as we
are assessing the feasibility of dropping the support to use
symbolic links as a symref.
But quite honestly, I do not think it is necessary to deprecate (let
alone remove) the support for reading side.
