Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm not totally opposed to this direction, but I'm a little concerned > about the stability/maintenance of the solution. In particular: > >> + NODE_URL=https://unofficial-builds.nodejs.org/download/release/v20.17.0/node-v20.17.0-linux-x86.tar.gz && > ... >> + curl -Lo /tmp/node.tar.gz $NODE_URL && >> + tar -C /__e/node20 -x --strip-components=1 -f /tmp/node.tar.gz > > This is pretty intimate with how Actions work (both the node20 version > and the "/__e/" magic). It's hard to say if/when that would bite us. Thanks for clearly expressing the uneasiness I felt, which I could not turn into concrete words, when I saw the patch first time. Each of these approaches may have its pros and cons, but I somehow do not see that the newly proposed alternative is 10x better than what was reviewed and queued already to be worth the effort to replace it. Thanks, both.
