On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 05:04:17PM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > Because we are going to drop support for "core.prefersymlinkrefs", add a
> > new fsck message "symlinkRef" to let the user be aware of this
> > information.
>
> I don't we fully decided to drop support for symrefs via symbolic links
> yet, so this is a tad too strong of a statement. I'd rather say that we
> consider deprecating it in the future, but first need to asses whether
> they may still be used.
>
Yes, that will be much better.
> Also, didn't we say that we'd want to remove support for _writing_
> symbolic links, but not for reading them? Not a 100% sure though.
>
I have re-read the Junio's patch about the breaking change. We will drop
the support for writing. But for reading we may or may not. I will
improve this in the next version.
> > if (update->new_target && !(update->flags & REF_LOG_ONLY)) {
> > - if (create_symref_lock(refs, lock, update->refname,
> > - update->new_target, err)) {
> > + if (create_symref_lock(lock, update->new_target, err)) {
> > ret = TRANSACTION_GENERIC_ERROR;
> > goto out;
> > }
>
> Why does the writing side need to change?
>
I squash two patches provided by Junio to sync with the "master" branch
to make sure the build could be passed. This is because Peff has
introduced the "UNUSED" check when building.
So we could just ignore this part.
Thanks,
Jialuo
