Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] hash.h: support choosing a separate SHA-1 for non-cryptographic uses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Peff and I wrote the first four (new) patches together, and I feel
> confident now that we're in a good spot to address the concerns raised
> in [1].

I just read the first four and they made sense.

With "fast" -> "insecure", the latter half of the series would also
cover the review comments on earlier rounds, I would imagine?

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux