Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If so, I agree, but would note that this series does not yet switch > index-pack to use the non-collision detecting SHA-1 implementation when > available, so that would not be a prerequisite for merging this series. Hmph, I am confused. It needs to be corrected in order to address collisions of the tail sum Peff raised, as no longer checked the tail sum with SHA1DC but with "fast" SHA-1. Doesn't it make it a prerequisite?
