Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yeah. I would actually like to get here in the long-term, but of course > that change is much larger than this one (the protocol would have to be > adjusted to learn a new "tailsum" capability for callers to negotiate > which checksumming hash function they want to use, etc.). I dunno. I was talking about strictly local tail sum, like the ones in the index file. You do not have anybody to negotiate about anything. We already agreed that the name of a packfile is a different matter.
