Re: [PATCH 2/5] apply: honor `ignore_ws_none` with `correct_ws_error`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I'm not very happy with the new enum, but I haven't come up with a
> better idea.
> ...
> None of them are better, I think.

Not adding a new enum is probably much better.  See the "additional
thought" in my review on [3/5], for example.

Thanks.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux