On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:09:44AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> These unused parameters were marked in a68ec8683a (reftable: mark unused
> parameters in virtual functions, 2024-08-17), but the functions were
> moved to a new file in a parallel branch via f2406c81b9
> (reftable/generic: move generic iterator code into iterator interface,
> 2024-08-22).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This should go on top of ps/reftable-drop-generic. Arguably this could
> have been done as part of the conflict resolution when merging into next
> alongside jk/mark-unused-parameters, but at this point I think a
> separate patch is the best way forward.
>
> reftable/iter.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/reftable/iter.c b/reftable/iter.c
> index 97a4642ed5..1d99fe4f7d 100644
> --- a/reftable/iter.c
> +++ b/reftable/iter.c
> @@ -25,17 +25,17 @@ int iterator_next(struct reftable_iterator *it, struct reftable_record *rec)
> return it->ops->next(it->iter_arg, rec);
> }
>
> -static int empty_iterator_seek(void *arg, struct reftable_record *want)
> +static int empty_iterator_seek(void *arg UNUSED, struct reftable_record *want UNUSED)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int empty_iterator_next(void *arg, struct reftable_record *rec)
> +static int empty_iterator_next(void *arg UNUSED, struct reftable_record *rec UNUSED)
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static void empty_iterator_close(void *arg)
> +static void empty_iterator_close(void *arg UNUSED)
> {
> }
These changes look obviously correct to me, thanks!
Patrick
