Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] cat-file: batch_write: use size_t for length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> fwrite(3) and write(2), and all of our wrappers for them use
> size_t while object size is `unsigned long', so there's no
> excuse to use a potentially smaller representation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/cat-file.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Obviously correct.  Thanks.

>
> diff --git a/builtin/cat-file.c b/builtin/cat-file.c
> index 067cdbdbf9..bf81054662 100644
> --- a/builtin/cat-file.c
> +++ b/builtin/cat-file.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static void expand_format(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void batch_write(struct batch_options *opt, const void *data, int len)
> +static void batch_write(struct batch_options *opt, const void *data, size_t len)
>  {
>  	if (opt->buffer_output) {
>  		if (fwrite(data, 1, len, stdout) != len)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux