Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Playing devil's advocate for a moment: what about programs that read > stderr but intend to relay the output to the user? > > For example, programs running on the server side of a push are spawned > by receive-pack with their stderr fed into a muxer that ships it to the > client, who then dumps it to the user's terminal. Would we ever want to > see their advice? > > My guess is "conceivably yes", though I don't know of a specific example > (and in fact, I've seen the "your hook was ignored because it's not > executable" advice coming from a server, which was actually more of an > annoyance on the client side). Ah, I should have waited to think about the topic before reading what you wrote. Yes, this is a huge downside. > Looking over patch 7, I think the escape hatch for all of these cases > would be setting GIT_ADVICE=1. Which isn't too bad, but it does require > some action. I'm not sure if it is worth it (but then, I am not all that > sympathetic to the script you mentioned that was trying to be too clever > about parsing stderr). This too.
