On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 03:24:21PM +1000, James Liu wrote:
> On Tue Aug 13, 2024 at 5:17 PM AEST, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > @@ -206,7 +224,7 @@ struct maintenance_run_opts {
> > enum schedule_priority schedule;
> > };
> >
> > -static int pack_refs_condition(void)
> > +static int pack_refs_condition(UNUSED struct gc_config *cfg)
> > {
> > /*
> > * The auto-repacking logic for refs is handled by the ref backends and
> > @@ -216,7 +234,8 @@ static int pack_refs_condition(void)
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > -static int maintenance_task_pack_refs(MAYBE_UNUSED struct maintenance_run_opts *opts)
> > +static int maintenance_task_pack_refs(MAYBE_UNUSED struct maintenance_run_opts *opts,
> > + UNUSED struct gc_config *cfg)
> > {
> > struct child_process cmd = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> >
>
> Are we defining *cfg as an unused argument to conform to the
> `maintenance_task_fn` signature?
Yup, that's exactly it.
Patrick
