On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 05:33:17PM +0530, Chandra Pratap wrote:
> In the current testing setup, block operations are left unexercised
> for obj blocks. Add a test that exercises these operations for obj
> blocks.
Same remarks here as for the preceding commit.
> @@ -186,9 +186,88 @@ static void t_log_block_read_write(void)
> reftable_record_release(&recs[i]);
> }
>
> +static void t_obj_block_read_write(void)
> +{
> + const int header_off = 21;
> + struct reftable_record recs[30];
> + const size_t N = ARRAY_SIZE(recs);
> + const size_t block_size = 1024;
> + struct reftable_block block = { 0 };
> + struct block_writer bw = {
> + .last_key = STRBUF_INIT,
> + };
> + struct reftable_record rec = {
> + .type = BLOCK_TYPE_OBJ,
> + };
> + size_t i = 0;
> + int n;
> + struct block_reader br = { 0 };
> + struct block_iter it = BLOCK_ITER_INIT;
> + struct strbuf want = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> + REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY(block.data, block_size);
> + block.len = block_size;
> + block.source = malloc_block_source();
> + block_writer_init(&bw, BLOCK_TYPE_OBJ, block.data, block_size,
> + header_off, hash_size(GIT_SHA1_FORMAT_ID));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
> + uint8_t *bytes = reftable_malloc(sizeof(uint8_t[5]));
> + memcpy(bytes, (uint8_t[]){i, i+1, i+2, i+3, i+5}, sizeof(uint8_t[5]));
