On 2024.08.09 12:29, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> We're sending this series as RFC because there is remaining work > >> we'd like to do, but we'd like to get early feedback on this approach, > >> and particularly to ask for advice on a few topics: > > > > I am not sure how much this is reusable, after seeing comments that > > "cgit-rs" may not be the best name for this thing and pathnames may > > have to change, but I needed the following merge-fix to get this > > into "seen" and have the result pass "make", due to interactions > > with the ps/config-wo-the-repository topic. > > In case you are wondering "so... is there anything actionable for > *US*???", there isn't, exactly. But you'd need to holler if the > "merge-fix" you saw in the message not correctly addressing the > semantic clash between these two topics. > > Thanks. Looks fine to me, applied in V2.
