Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes: > This is exactly the problem that zdiff3 has: There is no way to indicate > that some line in the common ancester was resolved identically and is > now outside the conflict markers. Do not use zdiff3 if you cannot live > with this deficiency. This is in fact not made explicit in the > documentation. Yes, indeed that is a problem and that is not I personally do not touch it even with a 10ft pole. We might want to stress it a bit more to warn potential users in our documentation. #leftoverbits then? Thanks.
