On Thursday, August 8, 2024 9:59 AM, Dragan Simic wrote: >On 2024-08-08 13:51, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> Cgit maintainer here... >> >> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 11:21:25AM -0700, Josh Steadmon wrote: >>> * bikeshedding on the name (yes, really). There is an active, >>> unrelated >>> CGit project [4] that we only recently became aware of. We >>> originally >>> took the name "cgit" because at $DAYJOB we sometimes refer to >>> git.git >>> as "cgit" to distinguish it from jgit [5]. >> >> Indeed, please find something else. Cgit is a real project, used by >> many, such as git.kernel.org, and it'll turn into a real hassle for >> both of us if there's ambiguity and confusion. > >Totally agreed, naming it cgit-rs makes pretty much no sense. > >> What about libgit-rs? Or even libgit3, where the rustness of it is >> simply an implementation detail, so the name won't feel dated 15 years >> from now when everything is written in Rust anyway and -rs is so 2020s? > >Well, there are still very active commercial projects written in COBOL or Clipper, for >example, so I wouldn't go as far as _everything_ being written in Rust at some point. There are hundreds of millions of lines of code in the NonStop (TAL, COBOL, C, Java, in that order) community that is actively maintained to this day, with no Rust involvement (not for lack of trying to get Rust ported). Without these projects, most of your credit and debit cards would probably not work. 😉 Many of these repositories are more than 500Mb, with a couple I have seen exceeding 2Gb (just for source code).
