On Nov 9, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Benoit Sigoure schrieb:Off topic question: why do you guys always do this instead of doing, say, this:INTERACTIVE=false case $1 in --interactive|-i) INTERACTIVE=: ... ;; esac if $INTERACTIVE; then git_editor "$TODO" || die ... fiBecause in some shells 'false' is not a built-in.
Can you name such a shell? (besides Solaris' brain-damaged, b0rken and foobared /bin/sh which will most likely not work with Git anyway)
But then this might do it without the extra process: INTERACTIVE="! :" # false
`!' is not portable either. In particular, I highly doubt `!' will work on shells that don't have `false' as a builtin (Hello Mr Solaris).
case $1 in --interactive|-i) INTERACTIVE=: ... ;; esac if $INTERACTIVE; then git_editor "$TODO" || die ... fi
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think that some shells don't have `test' as a builtin either.
-- Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna EPITA Research and Development Laboratory
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part