Re: [PATCH] config.c: avoid segfault with --fixed-value and valueless config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> Edge cases like this really make me wonder what the benefit of implicit
> bools is in our config files.
>
> So... why do we have them in the first place? Is there even a single
> good reason?

There isn't any good reason to introduce such a syntax if we were
desigining the configuration file format from scratch.  It was added
because originally Linus thought it was a cute syntax, and these
days a lot lot more importantly, it is kept working because you will
break a lot of existing configuration files that were hand tweaked
if you remove the support suddenly.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux