Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > Refactor the function that gathers table sizes to be more idiomatic. For > one, use `REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY()` instead of `reftable_calloc()`. > Second, avoid using an integer to iterate through the tables in the > reftable stack given that `stack_len` itself is using a `size_t`. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> > --- > reftable/stack.c | 11 ++++++----- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c > index 737591125e..ba8234b486 100644 > --- a/reftable/stack.c > +++ b/reftable/stack.c > @@ -1305,14 +1305,15 @@ struct segment suggest_compaction_segment(uint64_t *sizes, size_t n, > > static uint64_t *stack_table_sizes_for_compaction(struct reftable_stack *st) > { > - uint64_t *sizes = > - reftable_calloc(st->merged->stack_len, sizeof(*sizes)); > int version = (st->opts.hash_id == GIT_SHA1_FORMAT_ID) ? 1 : 2; > int overhead = header_size(version) - 1; > - int i = 0; > - for (i = 0; i < st->merged->stack_len; i++) { > + uint64_t *sizes; > + > + REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY(sizes, st->merged->stack_len); > + > + for (size_t i = 0; i < st->merged->stack_len; i++) > sizes[i] = st->readers[i]->size - overhead; > - } > + OK.