On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 11:33:55AM -0700, Josh Steadmon wrote: > On 2024.07.31 11:04, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > - I prefer that the proposed solution results in a single binary as > > compared to one binary per test system. > > Does clar allow running test functions in parallel? With multiple > binaries, we can at least run independent tests in parallel (although > right now the unit tests are fewer and so much faster than the shell > tests that it's hardly noticeable). Ah, that's something I didn't think of. clar does not support running tests in parallel. As you say, I guess for now that is fine and I'd claim that it likely is faster to just run all tests sequentially with a single binary if you also include build times. If that claim isn't true, or if we eventually grow a huge body of tests, then we should likely revert to having separate binaries. > As part of the original unit-test series, I wrote a comparison between > different frameworks: Documentation/technical/unit-tests.txt, poorly > rendered at [1]. Could you add a row to the table evaluating clar on the > individual points there? > > [1] https://git-scm.com/docs/unit-tests#framework-selection Ah, I wasn't aware of this document. I can update it depending on how the discussion goes overall :) Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
