Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Improvements for Perforce tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/07/31 12:37PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this is the second version of my patch series that improves Perforce
> tests a bit. As with the first version, the main intent is to mark all
> tests as leak free. The other two patches polish the Perforce tests such
> that they work on my machine, which has a more recent version of
> Perforce than what we have been testing with in CI.
> 
> As discussed, despite these patches I consider Perforce to be basically
> unmaintained, and my patches do not change that. But given that I don't
> think we can rip out git-p4(1) just so without any kind of announcement
> up front, I still think that these patches are worth it to help my own
> cause, namely plugging all memory leaks hit by tests in Git.

Agreed that proposing a removal of git-p4(1) is more of a separate issue
here. For now, these patches make sense so we can get closer to making
the tests memory leak free. :)

> 
> Changes compared to v1:
> 
>   - Fix some typos.
> 
>   - Add in-code comments explaining what the compatibility case
>     statements are about.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Patrick


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux