On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:26:40PM +0800, shejialuo wrote: > The names of objects-related fsck error functions are general. It's OK s/general/generic, I guess. > when there is only object database check. However, we have introduced > refs database check report function. To avoid ambiguity, rename > object-related fsck error functions to explicitly indicate these > functions are used to report objects-related messages. I agree that it is sensible to rename the functions to make it more explicit that they are only used by the object-checking infrastructure. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
