[PATCH v2 5/5] Documentation: consistently use spaces inside initializers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Our coding guide is inconsistent with how it uses spaces inside of
initializers (`struct foo bar = { something }`). While we mostly carry
the space between open and closing braces and the initialized members,
in one case we don't.

Fix this one instance such that we consistently carry the space. This is
also consistent with how clang-format formats such initializers.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/CodingGuidelines | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
index b63a8f9a44..3daa1f82bb 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
+++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ For C programs:
    . since around 2007 with 2b6854c863a, we have been using
      initializer elements which are not computable at load time. E.g.:
 
-	const char *args[] = {"constant", variable, NULL};
+	const char *args[] = { "constant", variable, NULL };
 
    . since early 2012 with e1327023ea, we have been using an enum
      definition whose last element is followed by a comma.  This, like
-- 
2.46.0.dirty

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux