On July 24, 2024 12:22 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Randall Becker <randall.becker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> What I actually proposed was splitting --build-options with runtime >> (some representative argument). This would allow the headers used at >> build time (--build-options) to be reported *and* the runtime >> (probably) DLL versions (but would also report static linked library >> versions) to be reported. Both are useful from a support standpoint. > >That certainly is a reasonable future plan. > >> However, the --build-options argument was intended to report an >> invariant set of values used during the build, so I would rather not >> conflate the two distinctly different semantic values. > >This reasoning makes sense to me, too. > >Please wrap overly long lines to reasonable width, by the way. Sorry about that. Outlook is a pain in that regard, and different recipients define different line lengths. I will do my best in future for git. --Randall
