Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] add-patch: render hunks through the pager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:58:36AM +0100, phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> > However, this error has exposed a problem: calling `wait_for_pager` if
> > `setup_pager` hasn't worked is an issue that needs to be addressed in this
> > series: `setup_pager` should return a result.
> 
> It already dies if we cannot execute the pager so maybe we should just die
> on other errors as well?

Honestly, I thought 78f0a5d187 (pager: die when paging to non-existing
command, 2024-06-23) would be sufficient for this series, but I missed
the optimization mentioned in my previous message.

Thinking in the context of "add -p", it might be more sensible not to
die but simply show an error, so as not to end the user's interactive
session.  But it could be a change in a future series and thus avoid
prolonging this one. 

However, if you can think of any other cases where we should be stricter
and die, I'm all ears.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux