Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > A more ideal solution would be if 'clang-format' allowed us to append > rules to the existing '.clang-format' when invoked. But such an option > does not exist. Since modifying the in-tree '.clang-format' is only done > on the CI job for style-check and doesn't affect any other jobs and is > not persisted in any ways, this hack should be okay. I think our mails crossed, but I do not know why this hack is OK. Are there other CI jobs that muck with tracked files in the working tree? Thanks.
