Piotr Szlazak <piotr.szlazak@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On the other hand there is no problem if http.cookieFile='' and > http.saveCookies=true is used together. Git operation is > successful. But if GIT_TRACE_CURL=1 GIT_TRACE_CURL_NO_DATA=1 is > enabled, I can see following warning it the output: >> 12:19:56.280263 http.c:820 == Info: WARNING: failed to save cookies in > It comes from: > https://github.com/curl/curl/blob/master/lib/cookie.c#L1758 > But cookies were accepted by the client and sent back to the server. Thanks for your experiments. I do not know if it is safe to call the above observed sympotom "there is no problem". What does it even mean to set cookieFile to an empty string and ask the cookies to be saved? What does the user who makes such a pair of requests [http] saveCookies = yes cookieFile = "" expect to happen? The session begins with an empty set of cookies, cookies that come from the other side are maintained in-core during the session, and then at the very end of the session what do they want to happen to their cookies? "The system will try to save them but without finding a sensible place to save, it gives a warning without molesting the main goal of the process (which is to interact with the other side)" sounds like a rather strange wish. I'd consider "The system notices that there is no sensible place to store, so it warns about the conflicting request and ignores http.saveCookies" a bit more sensible behaviour in such a situation, but obviously I am biased.
