RE: [PATCH 0/2] clone: shallow-submodules should be single-branch by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 1:00 AM, Bruce Perry wrote:
>Perhaps I was using imprecise terminology. This change should not impact whether
>submodule clones land in a detached head state, so it should not impact anything
>that assumes submodule clones are detached head.
>
>The change being made is this: "git clone --recurse-submodules --shallow-
>submodules" currently gives you a submodule with a detached head at the desired
>state, but also downloads data for the tips of all branches in the remote being
>cloned (potentially a lot of unneeded data as in my use case). The modification
>means the same command would give you a detached head at the desired state,
>plus the tip of only the default branch in the remote. The modified behavior
>matches the current behavior for a simple "git clone" followed by "git submodule
>update --init --recurse--submodules --depth=1".
>
>Thanks,
>Bruce
>
>(Resent due to a formatting failure)
>
>On Tue, Jul 2, 2024, 1:12 PM <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 3:08 PM, Bruce Perry wrote:
>> >I noticed a couple places where the behavior of recursive clones for
>> >shallow submodules does not match what is implied by the
>> >documentation. Shallow submodules should be, but aren't, single
>> >branch by default. It would also be useful to allow users to override
>> >the shallow specification in gitmodules on the command line for
>> >clones as they can for submodule update. The modification here for the former is
>a bit ugly, but hopefully at least gets the point across to start a discussion.
>> >First time submitting a patch here, hopefully I'm getting the process right.
>> >
>> >Bruce Perry (2):
>> >  clone: shallow-submodules should be single-branch by default
>> >  clone: no-shallow-submodules clone overrides option in gitmodules
>> >
>> > Documentation/git-clone.txt         |  3 ++
>> > Documentation/gitmodules.txt        |  4 +--
>> > builtin/clone.c                     | 10 ++++--
>> > t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh | 52
>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> > 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >
>> >base-commit: daed0c68e94967bfbb3f87e15f7c9090dc1aa1e1
>> >Published-As:
>> >https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-
>> >1740%2Fbaperry2%2Fsubmods-clone-bug-v1
>> >Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-
>> >1740/baperry2/submods-clone-bug-v1
>> >Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/1740
>>
>> I am concerned about this one. Many CI systems (including Jenkins GitSCM)
>assume a detached head for submodule clone/checkout. Adding a branch to the mix
>will change the expected semantics. Am I missing something?

Thanks for clearing that up. Fine with me.
Regards
Randall






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux