On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 03:00:19AM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> +static int read_oid_strbuf(struct merge_options *opt,
> + const struct object_id *oid,
> + struct strbuf *dst,
> + const char *path)
> {
> void *buf;
> enum object_type type;
> unsigned long size;
> buf = repo_read_object_file(the_repository, oid, &type, &size);
> - if (!buf)
> - return error(_("cannot read object %s"), oid_to_hex(oid));
> + if (!buf) {
> + path_msg(opt, ERROR_OBJECT_READ_FAILED, 0,
> + path, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> + _("error: cannot read object %s"), oid_to_hex(oid));
> + return -1;
> + }
> if (type != OBJ_BLOB) {
> free(buf);
> - return error(_("object %s is not a blob"), oid_to_hex(oid));
> + path_msg(opt, ERROR_OBJECT_NOT_A_BLOB, 0,
> + path, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> + _("error: object %s is not a blob"), oid_to_hex(oid));
> }
> strbuf_attach(dst, buf, size, size + 1);
> return 0;
This loses the early return in the "type != OBJ_BLOB" code path. So we
free(buf), but then continue on to the strbuf_attach() call on the
dangling pointer. Should it "return -1" like the earlier conditional?
-Peff
