Re: [PATCH 2/6] unit-tests: add TEST_RUN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 02.07.24 um 17:51 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>>> @@ -156,6 +163,7 @@ extern union test__tmp test__tmp[2];
>>>   int test__run_begin(void);
>>>   __attribute__((format (printf, 3, 4)))
>>>   int test__run_end(int, const char *, const char *, ...);
>>
>> We should add
>>
>>     __attribute__((format (printf, 2, 3), warn_unused_result))
>>
>> here to catch any errors in the format string / arguments and to warn
>> if TEST_RUN() isn't wrapped in an if() statement.
>
> Nice.  Especially the "unused" check is valuable.

This confused me for a moment.  I assume you both mean the new function
test__run, whose addition was cut from the citation:

   +int test__run(const char *location, const char *format, ...);

For that one the numbers make sense and the idea is good. :)

René





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux